<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>Forums - CPU Cooling</title>
		<link>https://www.pctechforum.net/</link>
		<description>The place to discuss CPU cooling.</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 11:52:16 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>vBulletin</generator>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title>Silverstone IceMyst Pro 360 Pro Review: Designed for RAM overclocking.</title>
			<link>https://www.pctechforum.net/forum/cpu-cooling/6137-silverstone-icemyst-pro-360-pro-review-designed-for-ram-overclocking</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 23:43:34 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Man, fans on the RAM? I have seen it before, but not like this. RAW. 
 
Silverstone IceMyst Pro 360 Pro Review: Designed for RAM overclocking | Tom's...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Man, fans on the RAM? I have seen it before, but not like this. RAW.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/liquid-cooling/silverstone-icemyst-pro-360-pro-review" target="_blank">Silverstone IceMyst Pro 360 Pro Review: Designed for RAM overclocking | Tom's Hardware</a>​]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="https://www.pctechforum.net/forum/cpu-cooling">CPU Cooling</category>
			<dc:creator>DOS</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.pctechforum.net/forum/cpu-cooling/6137-silverstone-icemyst-pro-360-pro-review-designed-for-ram-overclocking</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Thermal pads with in-built vapor-chambers claim 50 to 80 times better thermal conductivity than normal thermal pads — 1,200 W/m-K &amp;quot;Vapor-Pad&amp;quot; from Xerendipity designed to replace traditional TIM in a CPU]]></title>
			<link>https://www.pctechforum.net/forum/cpu-cooling/5994-thermal-pads-with-in-built-vapor-chambers-claim-50-to-80-times-better-thermal-conductivity-than-normal-thermal-pads-—-1-200-w-m-k-vapor-pad-from-xerendipity-designed-to-replace-traditional-tim-in-a-cpu</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 22:12:53 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>I will definitely look into picking these thermal pads up in the future, when I get another computer. 
 
Thermal pads with in-built vapor-chambers...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I will definitely look into picking these thermal pads up in the future, when I get another computer.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/phones/thermal-pads-with-in-built-vapor-chambers-claim-50-to-80-times-better-thermal-conductivity-than-normal-thermal-pads-1-200-w-m-k-vapor-pad-from-xerendipity-designed-to-replace-traditional-tim-in-a-cpu" target="_blank">Thermal pads with in-built vapor-chambers claim 50 to 80 times better thermal conductivity than normal thermal pads — 1,200 W/m-K &quot;Vapor-Pad&quot; from Xerendipity designed to replace traditional TIM in a CPU | Tom's Hardware</a>​]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="https://www.pctechforum.net/forum/cpu-cooling">CPU Cooling</category>
			<dc:creator>DOS</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.pctechforum.net/forum/cpu-cooling/5994-thermal-pads-with-in-built-vapor-chambers-claim-50-to-80-times-better-thermal-conductivity-than-normal-thermal-pads-—-1-200-w-m-k-vapor-pad-from-xerendipity-designed-to-replace-traditional-tim-in-a-cpu</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
